Supertake

The Great Software Rebuild

@jhodsdon

I think AI-generated code is piling up faster than anyone can maintain it, and within the next year or two that mess forces a wave of expensive rebuilds. The market treats IT services firms as AI's casualties, but I think cleanup demand swamps whatever billable hours AI replaces, so this basket owns the consultants who collect on that wave. It leans hardest into specialist modernizers who win rebuild contracts fastest, backed by global integration giants, offshore delivery firms for volume work, and government systems rebuilders with sticky contracts, plus cash held in reserve to add if the…

+23.7%

Consulting Survives the Shakeout

@sidv

I think the market is overreacting to AI killing consulting, when really it's killing the deck factories and body shops. Companies are still run by humans making hard calls, and someone has to stand behind the answer, so I own the judgment work like disputes and restructuring that's hard to automate, paired with firms actually building AI into implementation rather than just presenting it, plus government transformation specialists and AI-native disruptors doing real deployment work. I skip pure staffing and IT outsourcing on purpose.

+20.0%

Compliance Software Rebound

@rich

I think the market oversold compliance software on fears that AI makes it obsolete, but these are the systems wired into audits, regulators, and legal risk that nobody rips out for an unproven tool. So this basket leans into the deepest moats: systems of record for drug trials, local governments, insurance, and SEC filings, with smaller slices in tax and payroll engines, audit reporting tools, and identity controls. I'm holding 10% in cash to add if prices dip further, betting on a rebound over the next few months rather than ripping the idea out if the group stays cheap longer than expected.

+18.8%

Agents Get Audited

@ax1vc

Companies can't sell shares without audited books, but agents move real money with no independent check on their decisions, just the vendor grading its own exam. I think that gap closes once agents manage serious money, so this owns the businesses that sell trust for a living: ratings agencies, credit bureaus, and certifiers, while skipping pure security vendors and exchanges. It keeps a small cash buffer and holds no single name too heavily. I'd change my mind if agents stay stuck at pocket money, since then nobody pays to check them.

+16.4%

Therapy Goes Covered

@pedro

I believe therapy is becoming ordinary, covered healthcare, the kind of claim that's as routine as a dentist visit, and that shift favors the companies plugged into insurance rather than any single app. The core holding is teletherapy platforms moving toward covered lives, backed by payers writing the checks, in-network behavioral care systems, and the billing and benefits plumbing underneath, with some steady healthcare exposure for ballast.

+16.3%

Climbing the AI Value Stack

@ethan

I believe AI's value is climbing up the stack: the chips and cloud layers are built out and priced, so the next gains go to software infrastructure and then to AI-native apps, agents, and robotics where feedback loops compound fastest. The portfolio spans that whole ladder, from distribution-heavy incumbents to the data plumbing agents need to a smaller sleeve in robotics and consumer devices, with a cash buffer kept on the side. I'm weighting where value lands next rather than betting on one layer, and I'd rethink this if the migration upward stalls or reverses back toward the base layers.

+16.2%

The 30-Year-Old Cat

@rabbenhood

I believe genetic therapy could roughly double average cat lifespans within five years, and every extra cat-year turns into spending for whoever feeds, treats, and insures that cat. So instead of guessing which private therapy maker wins, I built a basket of the downstream beneficiaries, split evenly between everyday spend like food, litter, and retail, and medical spend like diagnostics, chronic-care drugs, and insurance. No single name dominates either side, and I kept a slice in cash to add if the therapy headlines land and the market catches on.

+16.1%

Work Stays Boring

@dan

I think work changes far less than the AI hype suggests, so I'm betting on the boring middle. One side owns the software tools people already use daily, which just bolt on AI and charge more. The other side owns businesses priced like AI wipes them out, payroll, IT services, data and research firms, screened for sticky customers and real cash profits. I keep a small cash buffer, avoid single-name concentration, and plan to hold for years unless the actual pace of job disruption proves faster than history suggests.

+15.9%

The One-Person Company Stack

@jenamehta10

I believe solopreneurship becomes a mainstream career path as AI lets one person do what used to take a team, so I own the plumbing every solo business needs to run itself. The heaviest weight sits in back-office software, the taxes, books, payroll, and invoicing tools, with the rest split across getting paid, storefronts, and the customer software solos run on. I lean on established platforms with smaller stakes in punchier names, keep 8% cash to add on dips, and plan to hold for years since this is a slow structural shift, not a quarterly bet.

+15.6%

Discovery Economy Toolmakers

@mattcynamon

I believe we're shifting from a knowledge economy, where you get paid for what you know, to a discovery economy, where you get paid for finding what nobody knows yet, and AI is the force multiplier making that shift real. Rather than betting on who discovers next, I own the toolmakers who get paid on every attempt: instrument giants, simulation and AI-for-science software, DNA synthesis and sequencing, lab automation, and physical-science instruments, spread broadly across the toolkit. I'm holding a cash buffer and thinking in years, not quarters.

+15.4%

Apple Holds, Chips Crack

@amplify

I believe Apple's cash-flow engine keeps holding up even as the AI chip rally cracks under its own weight. So I barbell it: Apple at the top single-position weight on one end, and a triple-levered inverse semiconductor fund at the same weight on the other, betting on a fast, sharp drop in chip stocks. Since that short side resets daily and decays if chips just chop sideways, I keep the middle deliberately boring with short-term treasuries and a large cash reserve to keep the shape honest.

+15.4%

The Collectibles Wave

@casey

I believe collector money keeps flowing into graded cards, comics, toys, and vintage stuff over the next couple of years, with comics eventually rivaling Pokemon cards in that world. Rather than holding the collectibles themselves, this owns the rails: marketplaces where they trade hands, the companies printing the cards and toys, the studios behind the characters on the covers, and physical resale and coin shops catching the same spending. It stays concentrated in the fastest-moving names for this wave, with 10% held in cash to add on down days.

+15.3%

Peptides End Obesity

@talmorgenstern

I believe retatrutide-class peptides will largely eliminate obesity, not just treat it, and the market still treats these drugs as a niche category. So the core is the companies that own the incretin franchises, with cash reserves held back as a buffer. Around that, I'm long steady, resilient junk food and soda names bought cheap on GLP-1 panic, and long group and experiential fitness businesses inheriting the spend as solo gyms and old diet programs lose share.

+14.4%

Wellness Happens in Person

@jackie

I think people are shifting spending from owning things to experiences that make them feel better, and wellness (edging into spirituality) is the fastest-growing slice of that. Since the purest plays are mostly private, I built the closest public version: gyms turning into longevity clubs, hotel and retreat brands, the landlords and equipment makers who collect from everyone, plus recovery clinics and spas. It's spread across five layers rather than one bet, weighted toward steadier operators, with some cash on the side to add if consumer spending gets shaky.