Supertake

Climbing the AI Value Stack

@ethan

I believe AI's value is climbing up the stack: the chips and cloud layers are built out and priced, so the next gains go to software infrastructure and then to AI-native apps, agents, and robotics where feedback loops compound fastest. The portfolio spans that whole ladder, from distribution-heavy incumbents to the data plumbing agents need to a smaller sleeve in robotics and consumer devices, with a cash buffer kept on the side. I'm weighting where value lands next rather than betting on one layer, and I'd rethink this if the migration upward stalls or reverses back toward the base layers.

+21.3%

AI Buildout Chokepoints

@rebecca

I believe AI will reshape the knowledge economy the way machinery reshaped industry, and in this buildout phase the value accrues to whoever controls the physical bottlenecks, not just the headline chip names. So this portfolio spreads across five choke points: power and grid equipment, foundry capacity, networking, memory, and cooling, tilted heaviest toward the constraints that take years to expand. It holds 16 positions with no single one dominating, plus a modest cash reserve to add on the sharp drawdowns this sector tends to serve up.

+21.3%

Discovery Economy Toolmakers

@mattcynamon

I believe we're shifting from a knowledge economy, where you get paid for what you know, to a discovery economy, where you get paid for finding what nobody knows yet, and AI is the force multiplier making that shift real. Rather than betting on who discovers next, I own the toolmakers who get paid on every attempt: instrument giants, simulation and AI-for-science software, DNA synthesis and sequencing, lab automation, and physical-science instruments, spread broadly across the toolkit. I'm holding a cash buffer and thinking in years, not quarters.

+20.5%

Watts and Wafers

@illscience

I think the market still isn't pricing how much AI compute demand keeps compounding over the next couple of years, and I don't think this is winner-take-all. So instead of betting on one champion, I own the whole chain, tilted toward the choke points: power and wafers, plus the memory and networking everyone needs regardless of whose model wins. It's built concentrated for a two-year window rather than a decade hold, with 10% kept in cash to add on rough days. If demand growth clearly stalls, that's what would change my mind.

+13.3%

Home AI Edge Compute

@nikita

I believe AI inference is moving out of the cloud and into hardware people own, as open-source models keep getting smaller and better. I'm expressing this through device makers shipping AI PCs and consumer GPUs, backed by the memory, storage, and edge silicon that gate local models, plus a small sleeve in the open-model ecosystem. No single position dominates, I keep a 10% cash buffer to add on dips, and I'm running this as a concentrated, two-year view rather than a forever holding.

+11.2%

Photonics: The AI Bottleneck

@henryvzero

I believe copper hits its limits as AI clusters scale, so moving data with light becomes the next bottleneck in the buildout, and the next couple of years favor whoever is already shipping optical gear. The basket spans the whole chain: laser and transceiver makers, the contract assemblers running near capacity, chipmakers pushing optics onto silicon, and the networking vendors selling finished systems, weighted toward the names with the most direct optical revenue today.

+11.1%

Data Center Builder Boom

@saihaj

I think the real money in the data center buildout over the next two to three years goes to the builders, not the utilities: the electrical crews, substation contractors, and mechanical shops with years-long backlogs. So the portfolio leans heaviest into grid and transmission builders and data center electrical and mechanical contractors, with smaller positions in site work, connectivity, and power plant EPC names that haven't fully caught up yet. I'm holding 10% in cash to add on the sharp swings these stocks tend to have around earnings.

+9.7%

The Knowledge Creation Engine

@akhil

I believe the entities creating the most net new knowledge, and owning what they discover, will compound faster than the broader market over time. So this portfolio pairs the discovery engines themselves, AI labs, drug researchers, frontier science bets, with the toolmakers everyone must pay to do that discovery: instruments, chip design, lithography. It is spread across 16 positions in five sub-themes, mostly large compounders with a few asymmetric bets, plus a cash buffer, built to hold for years since knowledge compounds slowly.

+9.7%

Robot Parts Inflection

@joshe

I believe consumer robotics is at its dawn, with an inflection coming in the next 2-3 years as humanoids, home robots, and robotaxis move past pilots. Rather than bet on which robot maker wins, I own the suppliers every robot needs: precision motion, perception sensors, robot-brain compute, and power electronics. It's deliberately concentrated in companies already landing design wins, with a cash sleeve kept back to buy dips in these high-beta names, and I'd rethink it if the design wins stop coming.

+9.6%

The Grid Is the Bottleneck

@homerick

I think the AI buildout will drive years of investment in getting electricity where it needs to go. Companies are already spending, and I think national competition will keep the pressure on. Whatever produces the power, it still needs connections, transformers, substations and controls. I want the businesses building and upgrading that infrastructure. My bet is that delivering reliable electricity becomes one of the durable ways to invest in the AI boom over the next five to ten years.

+8.6%

Starship Proves It

@aloke

I believe Starship reaches reliable reuse within a couple of years, launch costs fall sharply, and Starlink grabs a growing share of global internet traffic. SPCX is the core position, sized to conviction, surrounded by ripple effects: component makers feeding Starlink hardware, smaller space companies riding cheaper launches, telecom partners selling that connectivity, and defense contractors backing heavy lift. It stays concentrated and volatile on purpose, with cash held aside to add around Starship test flights.

+8.4%

Nuclear Baseload Full Stack

@razeghi

I believe nuclear is the only carbon-free power source that can meet round-the-clock demand from data centers and electrification, and that fuel supply is tighter than the market realizes now that Western buyers have to route around Russian enrichment. This take owns the whole chain: heaviest in uranium miners and fuel cycle names, then utilities already running reactors and signing power deals today, with smaller slices in equipment makers and next-generation SMR developers.

+8.2%

AR Becomes the Interface

@blade

I believe augmented reality becomes a real computing interface within a decade, rivaling physical screens, so I built a basket around companies whose futures are tied directly to that shift rather than buried inside a giant's product line. It holds the platform bets pushing AR as their main interface, plus the optics, chips, microdisplays, and software that make glasses actually work. I keep a 10% cash reserve to add when this volatile group sells off, and I'm holding for years, not trading the swings.